banner

PENNumbra is pleased to host debates between respected scholars on current controversies. The format includes an opening statement, a rebuttal, and closing statements by each side. Each contribution is expected to be one to two times the length of an average opinion/editorial newspaper article (i.e., 1,000-2,000 words), and without footnotes. Scholars interested in participating in a PENNumbra Debate should email the PENNumbra Editor at online@pennumbra.com.

FEATURED DEBATE
Workplace Federalism
by Paul M. Secunda & Jeffrey M. Hirsch
0 0
Paul M. Secunda Jeffrey M. Hirsch
In Workplace Federalism, Professors Paul Secunda and Jeffrey Hirsch debate whether it is the federal government or the states who are best able to protect the rights of workers. Professor Secunda argues that the states should serve as laboratories to “engage in thoughtful, legislative experimentation” in labor and employment laws. Professor Hirsch counters that such a proposal would exacerbate the problems with the current underenforcement of workers’ rights and, instead, the federal government should be given exclusive control of the workplace, under a single system of enforcement and regulation.
RECENT DEBATES
Medicare: Did the Devil Make Us Do It?
by David A. Hyman & Jill R. Horwitz

Light at the End of the Pipeline?: Choosing a Forum for Suspected Terrorists
by Amos N. Guiora & John T. Parry

Baze-d and Confused: What's the Deal with Lethal Injection?
by Alison J. Nathan & Douglas A. Berman

Collaborative Environmental Law: Pro and Con
by Eric W. Orts & Cary Coglianese

Voter ID: What’s at Stake?
by Bradley A. Smith & Edward B. Foley

Can Handguns Be Effectively Regulated?
by James B. Jacobs & David Kairys


Previous Debates From: